Lessons for the BJP: One Nation, One Culture Will Not Work in an India Proud of its Diversity
 Lessons for the BJP: One Nation, One Culture Will Not Work in an India Proud of its Diversity

 Lessons for the BJP: One Nation, One Culture Will Not Work in an India Proud of its Diversity

May 4, 2021

Bengalis are inordinately proud of their culture, perhaps even chauvinistic. Others are too about their respective regional culture, but Bengalis make it a point to emphasize that in non-Bengali environments, for example by speaking in Bangla in the presence of others or invoking local icons in every discussion. Bengalis find it the most natural thing to do, others may find it parochial.
They call those Bengalis who live outside the motherland as probashi, and they are judged for not being quite authentic, for having imbibed other cultures and thus having diluted their own.

In such an environment of exceptionalism, it was ambitious, if not foolhardy for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to try and win the state by pushing its Hindutva agenda and not appreciating what it is to be a Bengali. The BJP, with its one-size-fits-all strategy, did not fully grasp the essence of ‘Bengaliness’, which is as alien from the Hindutva as can possibly be imagined in a country dominated by Hindus.

At the very basic level, Bengalis are not given to worshipping Ram in the manner the BJP likes to prescribe – they do not say Jai Shri Ram, they are not vegetarians, they have no interest in the tenets of the Manusmriti. And they certainly do not speak Hindi or care to – there is no dearth of memes and jokes about a Bengali trying to speak the language. Indeed, there is a level of disdain for those who come from the Hindi belt.

Bengalis, especially Calcuttans, are proud of being cosmopolitans and their colonial connections – names of roads given by the British still visible, unlike say in Mumbai, and when a new name is given, it is after an international cultural or political figure (thus Shakespeare Sarani or Ho Chi Minh street in Kolkata). A BJP government will look askance at these. Beef is freely available and there are bars aplenty on Park Street, and the British-era clubs are proud of maintaining old colonial traditions.

The Narendra Modi-Amit Shah combine, brimming with confidence, came into the state armed with everything – money, muscle, and the power of central institutions and the national media. MLAs quickly defected from the Trinamool Congress and the media was quick to declare it a non-fight; Mamata Banerjee would lose. Both Narendra Modi and Amit Shah held innumerable rallies and Shah declared the BJP would win over 200 seats. Modi went full Rabindranath Tagore, growing his beard, but unlike the poet, known for his humanism and his contempt for nationalism, failed to modify his message and eventually descended into cheap name-calling with his mocking ‘Didi o didi’ while referring to Banerjee. That undoubtedly got the backs of the women voters up – Banerjee’s administration may be corruption-ridden, but she is personally loved and her simple lifestyle is much admired, never mind what the snooty bhadralok think about her.

But most of all, Modi and Shah were seen as bohiragarto, outsiders, who simply did not understand and appreciate Bengal’s unique culture. Their anti-Muslim polarisation strategy, which has proved successful elsewhere, did not work in a state that has not seen a major communal riot in a long time. Nor has Modi delivered on anything – from the economy to the management of the pandemic. What did he have to offer that the locals needed – what was ashol poriborton beyond a shallow slogan?

The Modi-Shah package has come a cropper elsewhere too. In Kerala, it never stood a chance, but in Maharashtra, even in 2014, the party managed to form the government only with the help of the Shiv Sena, which too was desperate to come to power. That combine failed to come together in 2019. But beyond political strategies and compromises, culturally, the BJP is hated in much of Maharashtra and has always been called a party of ‘Bhatjis and Shetjis’ (Brahmins and traders). Brahmins are viewed with great suspicion in the state, where history stands proof that they ruled by perfidy. In the aftermath of Gandhi’s assassination, Brahmin neighbourhoods in Bombay and other cities were targeted by angry crowds and politically, the scene has been dominated by the anti-Brahmin but no fewer casteist Marathas.

In Mumbai, Marathi speakers resent the imposition of vegetarianism by influential Gujaratis and Jains in buildings they own and dominate. Though Modi did impress many among the Marathi manoos in 2014, he was an unknown quantity and his emphasis on the economy and jobs were taken at face value. That charm had disappeared five years later.

Yet, the BJP continues to persist with single-mindedness with its one-point programme – to transform the whole of India with Hindutva and turn it into a Hindu Rashtra. That includes not just sidelining Muslims completely, but also imposing new laws and social structures in conformity with its own ideology. The BJP and its parent body the RSS actually believe that India, with an 80% Hindu population, can be converted into a Hindu Rashtra, despite strong evidence that there are differences in cultures and traditions, each of which the locals are proud of.

Many Hindus are simply not interested in political Hindutva – if they were, the BJP would get an overwhelming vote, far more than the record 37% it got in 2019. Most Hindus are secular and do not necessarily vote on religious lines. Modi’s success has been to bring into the fold those who believed that he was committed to growth and efficient governance, and now, with the struggling economy and the mismanagement of the rampaging pandemic, many of them are bound to move away.

The problem with the Modi-Shah combine and others like Yogi Adityanath is that they don’t know any other way. Modi ignored the desperate situation in hospitals and concentrated only on the Bengal elections and now is going ahead with a vanity project of destroying the Central Vista in Delhi at an estimated cost of Rs 20,000 crore. This is plain hubris and a cold-heartedness that is deaf to the cries of COVID-19 victims.

At some point, it has to give. Elections are won or lost because of several reasons, but a tone-deaf administration, that barges into a state without taking time off to appreciate and understand its culture, and neglects its dharma to govern, will run out of steam sooner or later.

The formidable reputation that the Modi-Shah combine has built up over the years as an unbeatable electoral machine, was already shaky because of many defeats, but now has been dented beyond repair. Banerjee made them look like amateurs, floundering in a state and among people who do not take kindly to being told by some Hindi speakers how they will change the state. We have problems but will attend to them in our way, the Bengalis have answered back. Modi and Shah should draw the right lessons from that.

Nidae Kashmir

A best news channel which publishes latest videos from Jammu and Kashmir which includes Politics, Public Grievances, Current affairs, Off-beat stories, Religion, etc. and We want to combine literature and journalism on one platform.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Banner

Global Covid-19 caseload tops 153.1 mn: Johns Hopkins
Previous Story

Global Covid-19 caseload tops 153.1 mn: Johns Hopkins

Why the Centre's PLI Scheme for Food Processing Sector May Not Be a Big Job Generator In a major push towards ‘atmanirbhar Bharat’, the Centre earlier this year announced a production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme for 13 key sectors with a total outlay of Rs 1.97 lakh crore. In all, nine sectors have already been approved for the scheme, and the remaining are in the process of obtaining nod from the Cabinet. While this initiative is expected to benefit all the sectors in accelerating growth and employment, the food processing sector is being looked at with high hope, being a sunrise sector and having immense potential to absorb labour. Enough evidence is available to show that India’s urban population is increasingly diversifying their food consumption towards processed food, fruits-vegetables, fish, meat, eggs and other dairy products. This move is visible among the rural population as well, albeit at a slow pace. Changing food consumption basket along with rising per capita income, and increasing urbanisation may encourage more number of food units and investment therein. The food industry has an untapped potential in many products, particularly fruits and vegetables. For instance, India is the world’s second largest producer of fruits and vegetables but hardly 2.2% of it undergoes processing. The planned outlay for food processing under the PLI scheme is about Rs 11,000 crore. The scheme is likely to create an additional output worth Rs 33,500 crore, with a potential to generate 2,50,000 additional jobs by 2026-27. While the specific eligibility criteria for it is awaited, the government plans to achieve these targets by supporting processing firms and meeting a stipulated minimum sales and investment requirement. The firms who would meet this criterion shall be extended an incentive ranging between 7% and 10% on incremental sales over the base year. The product segments that the scheme aims to target include ready-to-cook and ready-to-eat foods, marine products, processed fruits and vegetables, and mozzarella cheese and innovative and organic products. These measures may help the organised food industry, which has been facing the problem of low-capacity utilisation. The average estimated capital-output ratio in it during the mid-2015 was high at 4.89 compared to an average value of 2.07 during the eighties. It may imply that capacity utilisation in food and beverage industry is low and such incentives may offer an opportunity to use the resources and equipment’ efficiently and hence earn profit. Trends in organised food and beverage industry From the Annual Survey of Industries, we find that the number of factories in organised food and beverage processing sector has increased since 2000-01 from 23,988 to 40,162 in 2017-18 and so have their investment, output and total factor productivity growth. In contrast, the number of workers has increased from 13.5 lakh to nearly 18 lakh during the same period, growing at a modest 1.7% rate per annum. The processed food and beverage has 17% share in total number of manufacturing units; 14% share in total manufacturing employment and 9% share in total gross value added (GVA) in manufacturing. The share of firms and hired labour (employment) is much higher in unorganised micro and home-based processing units but tend to have a very low share in GVA. A higher employability in the unorganised enterprises may be explained by the fact that food processing is a traditional sector that has strong backward linkages with agriculture. Most of the establishments are engaged in primary processing of wheat, paddy, oilseeds and spices and significantly contribute towards self-employment and labour absorption. Falling labour intensity and other challenges The PLI scheme is a step in the right direction. However, the major concern remains with respect to the perceived impact of the scheme on generating large scale employment. A sluggish growth in employment is explained by a steady fall in labour intensity. Simply put, labour intensity is the proportion of labour used relative to the capital stock to produce the output. A declining labour intensity indicates an increased substitution of labour with capital; output increases but it does not generate enough employment. Labour intensity has plummeted consistently in processed food and beverage industry from 0.68 during the 1980s to 0.10 in recent years. It is slightly above 0.06, the average estimated for overall manufacturing, implying that processed food has the potential to absorb people, albeit at a slower pace. The PLI, which is mainly a sales-linked incentive scheme may end up increasing the speed of this substitution of labour with capital, and hence contribute to a further decline in labour intensity. The real challenge, therefore is to accelerate employment, which is possible only if structural issues responsible for declining labour intensity are addressed. Increasing automation and mechanisation of production and rising wage to rental price of capital have badly hit demand for labour. The unskilled and low-skilled workers are at the margins. The government must focus on creating employment opportunities, perhaps through increasing the pace of skills and training to the workforce. Incentives should also be given to firms engaged in subcontracting with the unorganised micro and small establishments for raw material or intermediate products. The organised food and beverage industry face many other challenges which deserve attention: production and packaging is expensive; safety and quality management procedures are inappropriate; access to regular finance is poor; the investment in transport and cold chain infrastructure for perishables is inadequate; technology adoption is poor; and the produce is not competitive in world markets. While the PLI scheme is a welcoming policy initiative to boost the processing industry, it may not immediately translate into creating productive jobs, unless well targeted policies are adopted to address the structural factors that inhibit its employment growth. Seema Bathla is a Professor at the Centre for the Study of Regional Development. Prateek Kukreja is consultant at ICRIER, New Delhi. Statistics quoted are sourced from Seema Bathla and Elumalai Kannan’s edited volume Agro and Food Industry in India: Inter-sectoral Linkages, Employment, Productivity and Competitiveness, Springer Nature, Singapore, 2021.
Next Story

Why the Centre’s PLI Scheme for Food Processing Sector May Not Be a Big Job GeneratorC

Latest from Breaking News

Go toTop